Window installation Psi values - jamb vs. sill vs. PHPP
Looking at the Passive House Details book (Passivhaus-Bauteilkatalog, 2008), I see that each window installation has a Psi value (linear thermal bridge coefficient) for the head and jambs ("header/reveal") and a different value for the sill ("parapet"). The sill is usually a stronger thermal bridge.
However, looking at PHPP, I have one column to enter a single Psi value for my window frame. There are not separate entries for jamb, head, and sill. I can't easily average the values, because the weighted average would be different for each window size. And I don't want to apply the worst value to every edge, because that would significantly under-represent my window performance.
How are people approaching this? Thanks, Dan Johnson Arkin-Tilt Architects

window PSI Values
Hi Dan
You should get your PSI Value from your window manufacturer. The PHPP uses the Value used with the German way of calculating it. The window size is 1.23m x 1.48m. the PSI value of the Frame stays the same but the U-Value changes with the size of the window
I hope it helps
Regards
Thomas Froehlich
Official word: just fudge it
Ryan at PHIUS told me to just pick a defensible number for the window install Psi value. But I wonder how PHI in Germany would explain their spreadsheet?
I decided to apply an uninsulated sill value from the Passive House Details Book uniformly to head, jambs, and sill; since in my case the window frame is not insulated from the exterior. If I had insulated from the exterior on head and jambs, I'd apply a weighted average value that includes the uninsulated sill. I'd use the most horizontally-proportioned window for my average, being conservative.
Using Moffett Field (Mountain View, CA) climate data, I'm not getting much difference either way. My guesses at "Shading" and wind protection coefficients make much more difference in my bottom line.
If I were developing a PH standard for California, I'd do tedious calculations for shading factors and guess at thermal bridges, rather than vice versa. Dan Johnson Arkin-Tilt Architects
Dan Johnson
Arkin-Tilt Architects
Fudginess
Dan,
I agree that shading is a huge concern for us here, but the psi values for windows can make a big difference. Here's a rather thorough presentation that might be a jumping off point for further research - it mentions a PHI document that is available but only in German - Sprechen Sie Deutsch???
http://www.aecb.net/PDFs/conference08/AECB%2020window%2020seminar%20209-...
GRAHAM IRWIN
CPBD, CGBP, LEED AP, Certified Passive House Consultant
ESSENTIAL HABITAT
healthy spaces for humans
essentialhabitatconsulting.com